Monstru Posted November 11, 2010 Share Posted November 11, 2010 You know matose, allways unlocking something, allways trying to open the doors that were closed by manufacturers.This time the subject is SLI on AMD 890FX boards, and we're talking about SLI, with 60-70% scaling numbers, not Lucid Hydra mixed multi-card. In this case, he used Asus Crosshair IV Extreme, and the PCI-E slots used were nr 1 and nr 3, that are connected directly to the chipset (in order to bypass the Hydra chip controlling the slots nr 2, 4 and 5. Guide for activating SLI on AMD 890FX platforms - LAB501 - Google Translate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted November 11, 2010 Share Posted November 11, 2010 Isn't Lucid multi-GPU performance > SLI multi-gpu performance? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmke Posted November 11, 2010 Share Posted November 11, 2010 no SLI/CF gives better results; biggest advantage of Lucid is the mixed GPU mode Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted November 11, 2010 Share Posted November 11, 2010 If I can find identical ATI cards, I'll give this a spin. As far as I know, ASUS claimed better results with Hydra multi-GPU than a native SLI/CF solution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmke Posted November 11, 2010 Share Posted November 11, 2010 http://www.anandtech.com/show/2910/4 and more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted November 11, 2010 Share Posted November 11, 2010 Yes, it used to be worse. Like I said ... ASUS claimed that Lucid was better than native SLI/CF on their AMD board. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.