1Day Posted January 1, 2011 Share Posted January 1, 2011 Are we meant to have the official wallpaper as backgorund here for this stage as well? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARandomOWL Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 3 scores have been submitted using "Ati Radeon HD 4200". I Believe this is not a "socket integrated" GPU and is infact integrated into the motherboard chipset. Therefore the scores are invalid? Also will sandy bridge be allowed to enter this category? Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 Official background - yes 'socket integrated' is a wrong term. Of course it's just 'integrated', both in the chipset as the cpu. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Day Posted January 2, 2011 Author Share Posted January 2, 2011 Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dualist Posted January 12, 2011 Share Posted January 12, 2011 Can you add the Nvidia GO 7400 to your list of integrated gpus as it's not letting me submit my laptop scores, nothing earth shattering but better than some Or do you mean the gpu is not a seperate chip.? http://i775.photobucket.com/albums/yy31/monkyspanker/go7400.jpg http://i775.photobucket.com/albums/yy31/monkyspanker/lappy.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 12, 2011 Share Posted January 12, 2011 Yeah, 'integrated' means 'not separate chip'. So either on CPU or chipset. 7400GO is separate chip. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dualist Posted January 12, 2011 Share Posted January 12, 2011 No problem, thanks for clearing that one up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 No one is going to use the latest technology? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunGod Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Great rezults from all nations! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slamms Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Congrats winners! Tell me please, how work 37 multiplayer with 4 cores? I can only 35 with 4 cores Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matose Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Also I'm interested in the tweaks for such high GT1 (359.5fps) in the 13779 GMA HD 2000 score. We tested the same or even better settings and never got over 330 - 335fps... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slamms Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Matose may be it is high clock for CPU Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saleen Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 (edited) Multi was set for turbo from bios. Not many tweaks used just good chip I guess. Also if you use 2150 Mhz works better than 2151-2199. Only 2000,2050,2100,2200 Mhz core works good and anything else does not. Not to forget when you use i7 2600 you get higher multies for turbo Edited January 16, 2011 by saleen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mollov Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Congrats winners! Tell me please, how work 37 multiplayer with 4 cores? I can only 35 with 4 cores It's the Turbo Boost... with little or no load, the Mobo was changing the multi as it pleased... I started SuperPI to make the CPU up it's MHz, but couldn't get a shot @3752, to show the benching freq., so I left it at 3966.... and that's why I entered 3966... it doesn't matter for the result itself... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slamms Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Turbo enabled. Default - 34. For 4 cores - 35 For 3 cores - 36 For 2 cores - 37 For 1 cores - 38 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matose Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Matose may be it is high clock for CPU I think the difference is too big to be just the CPU frequency Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slamms Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Need wait moderators opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew NeoForce Posted January 16, 2011 Crew Share Posted January 16, 2011 del Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mollov Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 So... you can't do such result, so you just remove it??? Really? That's really lame... it's like some people/nations just can't loose... I know, that XristoC has back up results with the same high GT1, so it's not a fluke... No comment... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XpuctoC. Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Well... my result has been removed. Can I know why this is so? If you do not believe to the screen shot - I can supply more, with similar results (although a bit lower - of course I have submitted only my best run). If you need verification of consistency - I can bench again and I will probably achieve very close performance in every test. I really feel this is not fair and if you punish me for a bug in the 3DMark03 - why didn't you punish the Russian team (whose work I really admire and, in fact, I am glad they got the first place which they deffinitely deserved) in Stage 2?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Changed the IGP of this submission: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2107068_ First article stated all Core i7 2xxx series have the HD3000 on board; another article stated it's only the K-sku that has the 3000. So, changed it back -sigh-/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mollov Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 (edited) Only the "K"-s got the HD3000.... everything else got HD2000... So i think, that his result is OK.... or? Edited January 16, 2011 by mollov Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Yes. If only Intel would be able to use their "insane processing" technology to build a useful website where I can find that information ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanski Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 OMG, that is so unfair now - if we don't believe screenshots, what then?! There is no rule about using bugs, as far as I see, and the Russians in Stage 2 did the exact same thing. After all it's also too late for adding that rule. Plus, knowing bugs is also knowledge of a kind. The guys from Romania just can't take it, but why should everybody conform with them?! They act as if they couldn't be loosing to us! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 So i think, that his result is OK.... or? Yep. Already changed it in the database. I'm now waiting for the engine to stop being stubborn and change the overall result. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.