Feature request - Performance product!

[knopflerbruce]

The performance product is the product of some (2D) bench result and CPU speed for that specific run. Quite a few people use it to find out how well tweaked the system is etc. Would be an interesting addition to the scores. I can't imagine it would be too much work to add it either, it's just a product of two variables:)

[Massman]

Performance product = Time x MHz ; gives an approx. view on how well-tweaked a certain run is.

Read this, PP maths in there: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=168567

[TheKarmakazi]

I also think this is a cool idea! Sometimes PP makes it easier to compare similar setups

[knopflerbruce]

or spot cheats:)

Exactly;)

[richba5tard]

Added feature request for tracking:
http://hwbot.org/dev/view_bug.php?bug_id=50

[richba5tard]

Should these additions cover all required feats for pp?

Application:
add min / max pp for each (applicable) bench app

Validation:
use min / max pp for manual submissions

Result page:
show pp
indicate whether pp is good or not

Hardware pages:
show pp per processor / videocard core

Search results:
include pp (between)

Moderation pages:
show pp in overview
show results with pp beyond min max of application

[knopflerbruce]

Should these additions cover all required feats for pp?

Application:
add min / max pp for each (applicable) bench app

Validation:
use min / max pp for manual submissions

Result page:
show pp
indicate whether pp is good or not

Hardware pages:
show pp per processor / videocard core

Search results:
include pp (between)

Moderation pages:
show pp in overview
show results with pp beyond min max of application

A minimum and a maximum PP is OK, as long as you're not too strict (it shouldn't block scores that are just below the best PP, or block a score made with alot of apps running, and slow memfreq + bad timings.). Just remember that PP is different for every CPU model;)

Show PP: yes!:) The mod stuff is yes as well IMO.