The official HWBOT OC Challenge April 2011 thread. [Archive]

View Full Version : The official HWBOT OC Challenge April 2011 thread.

Massman

04-01-2011, 10:27

Reserved for posting list of current records. I think Hipro's name will come up :D

Socket 939 (8312 results)

1) 53834 by macci with Athlon 64 FX-60 @ 3443.00 and Radeon X1900 XTX @ 774.00 / 870.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 550960 _)
2) 50596 by OPPAINTER with Athlon 64 FX-57 @ 3916.00 and GeForce 7900 GTX @ 998.00 / 883.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 573715 _)
3) 48108 by Pinto with Athlon 64 FX-60 @ 3300.00 and GeForce 7900 GTX @ 770.00 / 900.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 515923 _)
4) 47617 by Dynasty with Athlon 64 FX-57 @ 3624.00 and GeForce 7800 GTX @ 594.00 / 802.50 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 507149 _)
5) 47499 by maverik-sg1 with Athlon 64 FX-55 Clawhammer @ 3540.00 and GeForce 7800 GTX @ \N / \N (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 521642 _)
6) 47492 by maverik-sg1 with Athlon 64 FX-60 @ 3500.00 and GeForce 7900 GTX @ 769.00 / 910.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 538924 _)
7) 47254 by loggan26 with Opteron 165 90nm @ 3061.00 and GeForce 8800 GTX @ 620.00 / 1050.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 614290 _)
8) 46981 by eva2000 with Athlon 64 FX-60 @ 3436.00 and Radeon X1900 XTX @ 766.00 / 904.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 545467 _)
9) 46922 by gigi77 with Athlon 64 FX-57 @ 3606.00 and GeForce 7800 GTX @ 530.00 / 721.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 581129 _)
10) 46855 by s7e9h3n with Opteron 154 90nm @ 3781.00 and Radeon X850 XT @ 791.00 / 687.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 507319 _)

Socket 478 (1044 results)

1) 31693 by Thickbrit with Pentium 4 3.2 GHz Northwood @ 4112.00 and Radeon X800 XT PE @ 678.00 / 621.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 505039 _)
2) 31463 by ALT-F13 with Pentium 4 3.2 GHz EE @ 4243.00 and Radeon X800 Pro @ 630.00 / 610.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 566896 _)
3) 31018 by eva2000 with Pentium 4 3.2 GHz Prescott @ 3952.00 and Radeon X800 Pro @ 618.00 / 606.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 507153 _)
4) 30951 by macci with Pentium 4 3.2 GHz EE @ 4538.00 and Radeon 9800 XT @ \N / \N (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 550954 _)
5) 30917 by ALT-F13 with Pentium 4 3.2 GHz EE @ 4218.00 and GeForce 6800 Ultra @ 470.00 / 650.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 566898 _)
6) 30633 by IntelGuy with Pentium 4 3.2 GHz EE @ 4222.00 and GeForce 6800 Ultra @ 450.00 / 500.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 582769 _)
7) 30415 by IntelGuy with Pentium 4 3.2 GHz EE @ 4001.00 and Radeon X800 XT PE @ \N / \N (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 582762 _)
8) 30307 by eva2000 with Pentium 4 3.2 GHz Prescott @ 3962.00 and Radeon X800 Pro @ 604.00 / 617.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 604918 _)
9) 30225 by ALT-F13 with Pentium 4 3.2 GHz EE @ 4243.00 and GeForce 6800 GT @ 440.00 / 585.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 566900 _)
10) 30113 by eva2000 with Pentium 4 3.2 GHz Prescott @ 3991.00 and Radeon X800 Pro @ 555.00 / 621.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 507154 _)

Socket 479 (659 results)

1) 57036 by hipro5 with Pentium M 780 @ 4131.00 and Radeon X1900 XTX @ 1008.00 / 1008.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 618243 _)
2) 54418 by Tyrou with Core T2600 (2.16Ghz) @ 3811.00 and Radeon X1900 XT 512mb @ 710.00 / 810.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 526275 _)
3) 52777 by Tyrou with Core T2600 (2.16Ghz) @ 3602.00 and Radeon X1900 XT 512mb @ \N / \N (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 563053 _)
4) 49315 by stoolman with Pentium M 780 @ 3675.00 and GeForce 7800 GTX 512MB @ 800.00 / 1050.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 596184 _)
5) 48916 by Tyrou with Core T2600 (2.16Ghz) @ 3408.00 and Radeon X1900 XT 512mb @ 711.00 / 810.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 524992 _)
6) 48417 by boardy with Core T2600 (2.16Ghz) @ 3200.00 and GeForce 7900 GTX @ 800.00 / 925.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 545421 _)
7) 47547 by boardy with Core T2600 (2.16Ghz) @ 3161.00 and GeForce 7900 GTX @ \N / \N (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 544552 _)
8) 47387 by boardy with Core T2600 (2.16Ghz) @ 3187.00 and GeForce 7900 GTX @ 700.00 / 900.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 539075 _)
9) 47270 by Thickbrit with Core T2600 (2.16Ghz) @ 3445.00 and Radeon X1800 XT 512mb @ 753.00 / 815.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 547060 _)
10) 46732 by -De$troyeR- with Core T2600 (2.16Ghz) @ 3157.00 and Radeon X1900 XTX @ 805.00 / 910.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 526254 _)

Socket 370 (159 results)

1) 9886 by mega.alex with Pentium 3 1.4Ghz S @ 1648.70 and Mobility FireGL T2 @ 440.00 / 520.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 965314 _)
2) 9802 by mega.alex with Pentium 3 1.4Ghz S @ 1627.00 and Mobility FireGL T2 @ 438.00 / 510.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 959335 _)
3) 9715 by mega.alex with Pentium 3 1.4Ghz S @ 1627.00 and Mobility FireGL T2 @ 435.00 / 500.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 957738 _)
4) 9645 by mega.alex with Pentium 3 1.4Ghz S @ 1627.10 and Mobility FireGL T2 @ 430.00 / 486.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 955486 _)
5) 8534 by Campeonato with Pentium 3 1.4Ghz S @ 1754.03 and GeForce4 Ti 4200 64 @ 250.00 / 256.50 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 957288 _)
6) 8417 by Savage666 with Pentium 3 Celeron 1.1A Ghz Tualatin @ 1473.00 and GeForce4 Ti 4200-8x @ 300.00 / 270.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 657684 _)
7) 8191 by - Igor - with Pentium 3 Celeron 1.0A Ghz Tualatin @ 1400.00 and GeForce4 Ti 4200-8x @ \N / \N (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 528789 _)
8) 7836 by SST-SPB with Pentium 3 1.2Ghz @ 1205.00 and GeForce4 Ti 4200-8x @ 300.00 / 270.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 657694 _)
9) 7425 by Konar with Pentium 3 Celeron 1.0A Ghz Tualatin @ 1405.00 and GeForce4 Ti 4200-8x @ 290.00 / 276.75 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 628222 _)
10) 7153 by T0lsty with Pentium 3 1.0Ghz Tualatin @ 1600.00 and GeForce 3 Ti200 64MB @ 250.00 / 486.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 771941 _)

Socket 462 (no idea how many correct results)

1) 28031 by OPPAINTER with Athlon XP 3200+ @ 2780.00 and Radeon 9800 Pro @ 587.00 / 418.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 573722 _)
2) 25201 by Zeus with Athlon XP 2500+ Barton @ 2564.00 and GeForce FX 5900 @ 547.00 / 500.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 580460 _)
3) 25127 by BenchBrothers.de with Athlon XP-M 2600+ @ 2700.00 and Radeon X800 XT PE AGP @ 580.00 / 607.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 755071 _)
4) 23764 by Daniel Maia with Athlon XP-M 2600+ @ 2640.00 and Radeon X850 Pro @ 585.00 / 625.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 605044 _)
5) 23717 by WannaGoFast with Athlon XP-M 2600+ @ 2689.00 and Radeon 9800 XT @ 510.00 / 425.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 642750 _)
6) 23582 by dasregal with Athlon XP 3200+ @ 2647.00 and GeForce 7900 GS @ 665.00 / 700.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 2143868 _)
7) 23458 by kup with Athlon XP-M 2500+ @ 2880.00 and Radeon 9800 Pro @ 510.00 / 420.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 705430 _)
8) 22648 by jlewis02 with Athlon XP 2600+ Barton @ 2622.00 and Radeon X800 GTO PCIE @ 550.00 / 550.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 559564 _)
9) 22520 by BILKO1 with Athlon XP-M 2500+ @ 2972.00 and Radeon 9800 Pro @ \N / \N (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 628670 _)
10) 22449 by Dani with Athlon XP 2500+ Barton @ 2793.00 and Radeon 9800 Pro @ 516.00 / 375.00 (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/ 526705 _)

Massman

04-01-2011, 10:54

Socket 462 coming soon, need to fix a lot of incorrectly matches results first

Christian Ney

04-01-2011, 11:01

Just now that my P4C800-E Deluxe dies -.-

I will try to quickly treat it

Massman

04-01-2011, 11:06

Updated S462 list

Hampti

04-01-2011, 11:11

Pah the perfect competition for me but my new cascade is damaged. maybe i give my ss a try.

M.Beier

04-01-2011, 12:19

Wow... So many impressive results that will come out of this, congrats.... If ORB was up with 01SE scores, you'd see that top5 would look very different.... Even I, with sucky results (which you have reminded me about 700 times in March), would have made top3 on s479 list... (also with x1900XTX)

Got the approval link still;
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8961677
49634 T2600 @ 3421mhz X1900XTX water.. XP, not win2k

vipernet

04-02-2011, 01:32

Nice competition! Can see the socket 478 record going with some 945chipset socket 478 mobos having pci-e.

Tempted to rig up one of the socket 370 board I have on my wall and find the best agp card I have lying about to see what I get :)

Would dual socket 370 be legal?

placid

04-02-2011, 03:42

Hey.. where is socket 754 ? I only have this one :D

Antinomy

04-02-2011, 03:46

Massman, s479 is Pentium M/ Celeron M 3xx only.

T2600 and other Yonah cores are Socket M. The later Merom cores are Socket P. So wipe out the Core/Core2 out of the rankings. Or clear this out. Cause when people say socket 940 they don't mean AM2, right?

So 479 is not Pentium M/P.
Oh, and besides, the Socket M and Socket P are s478 :p

Massman

04-02-2011, 10:57

Socket M?

http://www.anandtech.com/show/2000/2

ZFeSS

04-02-2011, 12:20

Socket M?
Socket M.
http://global.aopen.com/products_detail.aspx?auno=2062

Massman

04-02-2011, 12:32

Ok, moved Yonah and Merom CPUs.

Gonna recalc de 479 record list :)

egm_xt

04-03-2011, 02:42

Very nice competition but why no socket 754???

Massman

04-03-2011, 09:08

No special reason. 5 stages is already quite a lot.

egm_xt

04-03-2011, 16:47

OK. Thank you Massman. My NF4-X will have to wait. :) It would be my best chance but lets try the other sockets.

sparkey247

04-04-2011, 18:12

they make a socket s478 to s775 adapter, is that allowed?

Mr.Scott

04-04-2011, 22:50

they make a socket s478 to s775 adapter, is that allowed?
Of course it is. You're using a 478 CPU, right? ;)

Massman

04-05-2011, 07:53

HW limitation is on CPU side, meaning you can use all the adapters you want. :)

Bones

04-07-2011, 21:48

OK. Thank you Massman. My NF4-X will have to wait. :) It would be my best chance but lets try the other sockets.

Awww.... That's too bad guys, maybe we'll have something with 754 later...

egm_xt

04-07-2011, 22:39

That would be great! I can´t wait for it ... Bones ;)

Massman

04-08-2011, 07:43

Any particular challenges on S754 that you'd be interested in?

egm_xt

04-08-2011, 11:59

One idea for a challenge would be that since socket 754 (and 478/479) are from the time there was the change from AGP to PCI-e and you can find boards for both types, why not do a couple of 3D benchmarks allowing 754 (and/or 478/479) with video cards up to the point you can find both AGP and PCI-e (nvidea up to geforce 7 series and ati up to series HD3000 or HD4000, I believe). There are socket 775, 939 and even AM2 and may be others with AGP and PCI-e boards also but that might miss the point. It may be too complicated but well it is an idea... :)

Bones

04-08-2011, 21:26

I agree with the above - Cards based on both GPU types can be ran on Socket 754 along with standard PCI cards too.

I'd also like to see something else besides GPU benching done for variety, maybe 1024M WPrime runs too?

We're currently running some PI benchies in a contest or two and this would be something different but not ruling either of those out. Since many AGP cards don't like or even in a few cases run some of the newer 3D benchies, I'd suggest something compatable for all.

Barton

04-08-2011, 22:52

Massman, that would be great. A four part S754 challlenge.

Two video card challenges and two long processor benchmark challenges.

1) PCMark 05

2) 3DMark 01

3) Super Pi 32m

4) WPrime 1024m

The two long processor benchmarks will be a worthy challenge for all of us. They involve more fine tuning and benchmark skills that the short ones, IMO.

Let's do it for May 2011. April is already has a good Challenge.

==================================================

Edit: Following up on Bones, idea, How about a six part challenge?

1) PCMark 05 - open class for any video card

2) PCMark 05 - limited to AGP and plain PCI video cards only

3) 3DMark 01 - open class for any video card

4) 3DMark 01 - limited to AGP and plain PCI video cards only

5) Super Pi 32m

6) WPrime 1024m

Bones

04-09-2011, 01:47

Barton

04-09-2011, 04:36

Don't forget NF4 chipped 754 boards have PCI-E slots for cards.
That's the reason for suggesting two different classes for the PCMark 05 and 3DMark 01 benches.

The "any video card permitted" class would allow the submission of scores earned with PCI-e cards...

While the "limited to AGP and plain PCI video cards" class would not include PCI-e cards.

That way everyone would have a chance to compete on a more level playing field - unless I've missed something there...?

Vinster

04-10-2011, 01:42

knopflerbruce

04-10-2011, 01:52

Isnt PCMark more about storage anyway? No need to separate GPUs?

I'm thinking the following is a good set of benchmarks:

01/PCI
01/AGP
01/PCIE
PCMark05/ANY
superpi 32m
wprime 1024m

...although I'm not sure if it's a good idea to have that many long benchmarks (3). Maybe wprime 32m instead?

Bones

04-10-2011, 07:39

That's the reason for suggesting two different classes for the PCMark 05 and 3DMark 01 benches.

The "any video card permitted" class would allow the submission of scores earned with PCI-e cards...

While the "limited to AGP and plain PCI video cards" class would not include PCI-e cards.

That way everyone would have a chance to compete on a more level playing field - unless I've missed something there...?

I see the point you're making here.

As for longer bench runs, again we have two comps already running the 32M Super PI bench and the 1024M WPrime is a suggestion for a longer run.
Here's a thought - A real challenge for this socket would be MaxxMem since 754 doesn't support dual channel RAM.
If you can get a good score there, you've really done something.

Christian Ney

04-11-2011, 07:33

C2Q Q9000 belongs to ? s478 or s479 ? Or I am fucked ?

http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/screenshot/1218067.png

Strunkenbold

04-11-2011, 15:27

C2Q Q9000 belongs to ? s478 or s479 ? Or I am fucked ?

Last one.

Massman

04-11-2011, 15:33

Socket P?

Christian Ney

04-11-2011, 15:55

huhu then I am fucked.

I really need to find a s478 board that can resist me...

Score s478 board : 7 Dead - 1 Alive (But it's a DELL board -.-)

Massman

04-11-2011, 16:25

Heh, "but it's a dell".

Working Dell is worth as much as a dead board :D.

Christian Ney

04-11-2011, 16:59

lol....

I need to find and fix why series of hardware die asap

Boards who died my hands :

s478 => 7
socket 7 => 1
LGA775 => 1 (ir's normal it was an Acer board :D)

CPUs who died in my hands :
s462 (aka Socket A) => 13
s478 => 1
s370 => 1

s462 CPUs and s478 Boards have a problem with my face

Turrican

04-11-2011, 17:10

wtf? seems like you are a "killer". :D

Cyph3r Smurf

04-11-2011, 17:11

s462 CPU is like shit ^^ The core dies to easy if you mount the cooler too hard. Killed a few ones.

But can't tell you why and how you manage to kill that many boards :D same cpu each time ? and how are they killed ? blowing mosfets or?

Christian Ney

04-11-2011, 18:09

Not the same cpu, but the same psu :D

I don't remember, but one died cause of the BIOS, one the power design burst, one has the clockgen that died, one is because she killed 3 cpus so I decided that this one is dead :D .....

But all other 71 Motherboards I have are alive :D

egm_xt

04-15-2011, 15:57

I have been looking at the 462 best scores and the 1st one, I believe is for an Athlon 64 3200+ not a 462 socket. In the description there is a mention to Athlon 64. Also the result might seem a little too high for a 462/ATI9800 combination. Actually correcting the processor will not change any points, it is just to be sure what is the current 462 record for 3d01.

I.nfraR.ed

04-15-2011, 16:49

I killed my best s.A chip in the last competition. The mount was too hard and it ended with a cracked core. It's easy to kill such a naked chip if you're not careful enough.

knopflerbruce

04-15-2011, 20:44

I'm wondering if I should try 478 this weekend... no idea how to OC this platform, though.:p Ln2 should help. Then I can try some more 939 action later, 57k shouldn't be too hard really.

I.nfraR.ed

04-15-2011, 21:05

I'll try to do some catch up :)

vipernet

04-15-2011, 21:15

I'm wondering if I should try 478 this weekend... no idea how to OC this platform, though.:p Ln2 should help. Then I can try some more 939 action later, 57k shouldn't be too hard really.

Please don't ;-)

_0CooL_

04-17-2011, 16:24

i can't post s370 result, we can't create any team :(

Massman

04-17-2011, 17:47

i can't post s370 result, we can't create any team :(

Please PM me the details of the new team you want to create (name, forum, etc). I'll create it manually so you can join and manage it.

_0CooL_

04-17-2011, 22:56

done by StrategosSan. Thanks for all ^^

GunGod

04-28-2011, 12:30

Can we submit results on 30-th and if yes to what GMT? I still wait for my gpu to come :(

Mr.Scott

04-30-2011, 23:46

Congrats to PCGH on your victory. :)

egm_xt

05-01-2011, 11:50

This was a great competition. Congrats to PCGH. Thanks to all the other teams for the good time. :)

Massman

05-01-2011, 11:58

Nice win PCGH! Also nice to see no less than 3 ancient platform records being smashed.

Here are the new platform records for s939, s370 and s478!

submission
submission
submission

Lippokratis

05-01-2011, 12:43

thanks a lot. it was a nice challenge. congrats to the others teams for the nice challenge.

I.nfraR.ed

05-01-2011, 18:03

Nice competition, but unlucky for me, I didn't even submit a score for my favorite platform - s.462 :(
2 s.462 dead boards, I dead FX55, one resurrected DFI Ultra-D, one exploded PSU Corsair HX850.

GunGod

05-03-2011, 00:44

Gratz to all winners and "players"

knopflerbruce

05-04-2011, 21:48

I was in hospital during the last few days of this competition, so I couldn't push my 939 score higher, but I think 58k is doable :)

I.nfraR.ed

05-18-2011, 18:09

Despite this it remained unbeaten :). Hope you're feeling well already. I was actually suprised that noone got over my result.