Vinas Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 I don't have any newer screens of this run so I can't get this verified. It's unfortunate because the xs mod 1.5 did not exist when this was run and I do not have the octopus cold water machine anymore... So much for all that hard work because it looks like the mods aren't going to take this (even though it has a valid verification code?)... I'm just going to keep this up there because we all know it is a legit run and it provides a point of reference for our team. NewPants, remember this was the contender to your opti at the time! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 The problem is that there's no CPU CPU-Z tab in the score. Although a verification link indicates something, it's most definitly not 'enough' to serve as verification. A CPU CPU-Z tab is an absolute necessity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 I would say that if the memory frequency in the cpuz mem tab and the one in the validation link match, as well as core temp displaying the correct cpu, and the score is normal for these clocks, then it should be possible to OK it under the "common sense" guideline. PS: the format of the screenshot is awful, why did you make it so wide? I can barely read it on my 1280x1024 monitor... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 I would say that if the memory frequency in the cpuz mem tab and the one in the validation link match, as well as core temp displaying the correct cpu, and the score is normal for these clocks, then it should be possible to OK it under the "common sense" guideline. PS: the format of the screenshot is awful, why did you make it so wide? I can barely read it on my 1280x1024 monitor... Sorry, but CPU CPU-Z is like the most essential part of verifying a score. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 There is a whole load of unnecessary crap in that screenshot (IMHO) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 Then this case is pretty clear. Why wasnt it included in the first place, btw? The program had to be opened to be able to make a validation file... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 Even ancient scores (pre-2004) I wouldn't allow in the database if the cpu info is missing. It's so darn vital ;D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.