question/ very good suggestion. - Page 2

Eeky NoX · #11 06-06-2012, 14:25

I don't use...

Stand alone netframework 4.0 installer makes my system reboot constantly -.-

Leeghoofd · #12 06-06-2012, 17:05

and painfully slow at startup... messed up 2 Windows installations with that crap...

GENiEBEN · #13 06-10-2012, 18:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leeghoofd

and painfully slow at startup... messed up 2 Windows installations with that crap...

Never understood why they compiled with /net40 as target.

How about you target net 2.0 so it's lighter on OS front? Nothing from 2.0 to 4.0 that it's needed for your small wrapper.

zzolio · #14 06-10-2012, 22:52

can we change the name to. AM3 so we can tell the difference between AM3 and heaven

ARandomOWL · #15 06-11-2012, 12:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by GENiEBEN

Never understood why they compiled with /net40 as target.

How about you target net 2.0 so it's lighter on OS front? Nothing from 2.0 to 4.0 that it's needed for your small wrapper.

<img>

I was going to suggest that a while ago

xxbassplayerxx · #16 06-15-2012, 07:24

I hate having to install 4.0!

Eeky NoX · #17 06-15-2012, 10:17

I don't hate... I can't!!!!

K404 · #18 06-15-2012, 10:41

Don't ATI drivers NEEED .Net for CCC? If there's no way around that, .Net is going on anyway (for a lot of scores,) so why complain?

GENiEBEN · #19 06-20-2012, 15:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by K404

Don't ATI drivers NEEED .Net for CCC? If there's no way around that, .Net is going on anyway (for a lot of scores,) so why complain?

CCC does not use 4.0. Nothing actually does or should.

uncle fester · #20 06-20-2012, 15:20

why was a wrapper even need for am3. we didnt have any issues with cheaters apart from u know who