Go Back   hwbot.org > HWBOT international > Discuss submissions

Discuss submissions Discuss submissions of other overclockers.

Reply
Thread Tools
  #1  
Unread 06-26-2012, 10:11
I.nfraR.ed I.nfraR.ed is offline
transformer
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 503
Default

This one is great!
What batch?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 06-26-2012, 10:18
BeepBeep2 BeepBeep2 is offline
robo cop
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UNITED STATES
Posts: 202
Default

1212 PGT, same as the other one I had.
Max valid is going to be less than 6.8...1M only passed at 6725.

Works on all 4 cores, but 4.3 is max CPU-NB @ 1.68v
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 06-26-2012, 10:23
I.nfraR.ed I.nfraR.ed is offline
transformer
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 503
Default

They all look almost the same. I was able to get 4.5 at 1.675 or something.
Try one core, it might allow the first one validate higher. I was not able to do anything good with more than 2 cores, although two of the others seemed better.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 06-26-2012, 10:27
BeepBeep2 BeepBeep2 is offline
robo cop
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UNITED STATES
Posts: 202
Default

1st core froze when I bumped up freq to 6.6, 3 froze at 6.5. 4 was okay up to 6.7 (just sitting) but it froze shortly after. The second core is the strongest on this one.

1210 PGT X4 965 still here, about 10-12L LN2 left. Gonna bin cores on air this time around to save LN2, and see how the CPU-NB is, maybe it will be better than this latest 955.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 06-26-2012, 10:38
BeepBeep2 BeepBeep2 is offline
robo cop
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UNITED STATES
Posts: 202
Default

I wanted to note that I'm a little confused by Ananerbe's 1209 PGT 955 though...it does 7.15 CPU-Z, that would lead me to believe it would do over 7 GHz 32M if it works like our chips.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 06-26-2012, 10:50
I.nfraR.ed I.nfraR.ed is offline
transformer
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 503
Default

That would be sick. Will wait and see
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 06-26-2012, 13:04
Don_Dan Don_Dan is offline
robo cop
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 254
Default

Nice work!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 06-27-2012, 06:26
BeepBeep2 BeepBeep2 is offline
robo cop
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UNITED STATES
Posts: 202
Default

Slow board is slow.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 06-27-2012, 06:54
Calathea Calathea is offline
grunt bot
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SWEDEN
Posts: 158
Default

Weird cpu, this high 32m should mean close to 7g valid.In my experience 6750 Mhz 1M = 6,9+ valid (980BE)
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 06-28-2012, 18:25
BeepBeep2 BeepBeep2 is offline
robo cop
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UNITED STATES
Posts: 202
Default

@Calathea
These new 2012 chips are different, my 965 too does 6.8 32M but only validates about 6.9. I don't know why...
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:26.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright COLARDYN IT GCV 2004 - 2013