The official HWBOT Team Cup 2012 - SC2:

[Mr.Scott]

Originally Posted by Robi

Hearing exactly from you that i am "b1tching" and quick on the report button is the joke of the year!

Keep it up. There are quite a few more of your submissions that don't conform to the rules. If I reported them all you'd have like 2 points left.

[knopflerbruce]

Originally Posted by a2b

Very interesting. Lerning never stops.

Where did you get this, i would say, rare CPUs?
You also have lots of processors for Socket 939 and AM2 that i've never heard of. ^^

Ebay, plus I got a friend who worked for AMD a long time ago

[Robi]

Originally Posted by Mr.Scott

Keep it up. There are quite a few more of your submissions that don't conform to the rules. If I reported them all you'd have like 2 points left.

If you have nothing better to do feel free to report all my "standard stock clocking runs" with bad scores and make yourself ridiculous.

And please go through all the submissions in the core 2 stage that don't have correct screenshots too. Would save us all a lot of time

I also would suggest you as "screenshot prove guy" for Hwbot, you can look for not 100% correct screenshots all day then!

[Mr.Scott]

Originally Posted by Robi

If you have nothing better to do feel free to report all my "standard stock clocking runs" with bad scores and make yourself ridiculous.

And please go through all the submissions in the core 2 stage that don't have correct screenshots too. Would save us all a lot of time

I also would suggest you as "screenshot prove guy" for Hwbot, you can look for not 100% correct screenshots all day then!

Not interested.
Just proving a point is all.
I'm done with this conversation.

[knopflerbruce]

Sandbaggers!!

[Leeghoofd]

Look it's the world against Knopf's CPU collection lol

[HobieCat]

So, is setting 64 threads allowed? If so, then I need to re-bench.

[knopflerbruce]

Yep. I have to rerun a bunch of stuff too Oh well, better this way than to get our ass kicked in the last second I suppose (although I fear that will happen anyway, probably more tweaks out there I don't know of)

[GENiEBEN]

Originally Posted by knopflerbruce

(although I fear that will happen anyway, probably more tweaks out there I don't know of)

Dont worry I dont participate But yes, there is another one.

[knopflerbruce]

Allright, I seem to have screwed up a couple of subs by not having the launcher visible... it's listed as mandatory. However, why is it mandatory? It's just a launcher, and AFAIK all info can also be found in the verification link. Is it fair to say that if you've got a verification link then the launcher isn't really that necessary after all, as the same info can be found there? (IMO the launcher not needed in any case, there's no relevant info there that's not covered by CPUZ).