Go Back   HWBOT forum > > >


User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Unread 1 Week Ago
Amd_ocer Amd_ocer is offline
maintenance bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 15
Thanks: 4
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Amd_ocer is on a distinguished road
Default Re: G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 C14-14-14-34 1,35v Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by I.nfraR.ed View Post
Well, that's the AMD "optimization", I guess Most important is the chip - B-die.
Both kits I have (old 3600C17 and 3733C17) work without a problem on Ryzen. I even tested for stability 4x8GB at 3200 14-14-14-34 1T (trying to mimic that G.Skill screenshot from some time ago) at 1.35V. Also managed 3800+ at C12 bench "stable".

But I guess it is good for people who just plug and play. It will offer a little better performance compared to 2133 JEDEC.

And, this FlareX doesn't seem too bad, considering many recent high bins fail on the same test. It could be much worse, plus voltage tolerance is higher than expected.
I just want to make sure, did you get the 3200 at 14 timing through 4x8gb even with the 3600 CL17 kit?? Can I achieve those numbers with a 2x2x8gb kit running at 3600C17?

Thanks for confirming
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Unread 1 Week Ago
Amd_ocer Amd_ocer is offline
maintenance bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 15
Thanks: 4
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Amd_ocer is on a distinguished road
Default Re: G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 C14-14-14-34 1,35v Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by I.nfraR.ed View Post
Well, that's the AMD "optimization", I guess Most important is the chip - B-die.
Both kits I have (old 3600C17 and 3733C17) work without a problem on Ryzen. I even tested for stability 4x8GB at 3200 14-14-14-34 1T (trying to mimic that G.Skill screenshot from some time ago) at 1.35V. Also managed 3800+ at C12 bench "stable".

But I guess it is good for people who just plug and play. It will offer a little better performance compared to 2133 JEDEC.

And, this FlareX doesn't seem too bad, considering many recent high bins fail on the same test. It could be much worse, plus voltage tolerance is higher than expected.
Was the 4x8gb 3200 C14 achieved with 4x8gb 3600C17 or a mix of the 3600 and 3733 kits? Please provide us with more details
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Unread 1 Week Ago
I.nfraR.ed I.nfraR.ed is offline
robot overlord
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 1,292
Thanks: 72
Thanked 133 Times in 69 Posts
I.nfraR.ed
Default Re: G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 C14-14-14-34 1,35v Review

I have 2 kits: One is older (Jan 2016) 3600C17 (17-18-18-38 XMP) and the other one is more recent 3733C17 (17-17-17-37 XMP).
The 3200C14 test was done with both kits in a 4x8GB combination. Both kits do 4000+ 12-11-11 on Apex motherboard.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[AT] G.Skill Announces Trident Z RGB DDR4 Kits with 16 GB Modules, Up to 128 GB hwbotrss Tech News RSS 0 2 Weeks Ago 16:40
WTB: Samsung B-Die 4 x 8GB DDR4 Quad Kit 3200 C14 kit im_late Sold 1 4 Weeks Ago 04:31
G.Skill 3200 C15 not running well on C6H Masterchief79 Ryzen | Bristol Ridge (AM4) 10 03-16-2017 05:06
DrWeez | Overclocking Session #45: MSI Z170 XPower Gaming Titanium & G.Skill TridentZ DDR4 4000Mhz sdougal Overclockers on YouTube 0 01-25-2017 02:40
[AT] G.Skill Announces Trident Z DDR4 DIMMs for Kaby Lake CPUs hwbotrss Tech News RSS 0 01-04-2017 18:00


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:00.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright HWBOT 2004 - 2015