Go Back   HWBOT forum > Overclocking & benchmarking > AMD CPU Overclocking > Bulldozer OC

Bulldozer OC Welcome to AMD construction yard. Please insert coin to play.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-18-2012
Massman's Avatar
Massman Massman is offline
In the distance
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Taipei
Posts: 22,577
Massman has a spectacular aura aboutMassman has a spectacular aura aboutMassman has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Massman
Default LN2 test - Bulldozer FX-8120 || GIGABYTE 990FXA-UD7 || 4x Radeon HD 7970

Hey all,

Short post because the CPU was not good.

As we all know, in between now and April 29th, there's pretty much nothing to do for the extreme overclocker since Ivy Bridge will kick ass. So instead, I wanted to see how good a full AMD setup really performed in 3DMark11. Before, I already tested Bulldozer with 4x GTX580, but that ended up in one big LOL/LMAO/ROFL-fest since it could hardly compete with any other similar setup. So, hopes were not that high to begin with. In any case, I started with a simple run on air cooling to check initial performance.

I pushed the CPU to 4GHz (small OC) on simple air cooling. The result was mindblowing:


(no tesselation tweaking)

Very promising start.

Without too much stress, we could then pull down the CPU to -180C and see how high it could clock. Turns out ... not so high. 6150MHz stable through Physics was about the maximum! One core kept bugging in the tests, so ... little we can do about it. With 6G only, it was already quite obvious that this setup wouldn't be doing too well. Anyway, had some fun pushing the NBclk and DRAMclk in physics. 990FXA-UD7 still is my favorite AMD board .

Eventually, I ended up around 18.2k (tesselation disabled).



At 6GHz, this score isn't that bad (for Bulldozer) relatively speaking. 20K wasn't that super-easy with the GTX580s, with 7970s it should be quite possible. But, well, you need a good CPU.

Playing with memory and physics is still quite fun, though. I managed a little higher memory clocks through Physics. Should be interesting to see what happens when the memory is under LN2 too!





Hardware used

- AMD Phenom FX-8120 (retail)
- GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD7 (F5 bios)
- 4x Sapphire Radeon HD 7970
- 2x 2GB GSkill Flare
- Coolermaster Silent Pro M 1000W
- Thortech Thunderbolt 1200W

Some pictures of the session:













Till the next time!
__________________
Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.

For all HWBOT community related questions, contact Christian Ney or Websmile. For any other questions, contact me at pieter@hwbot.org.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-18-2012
TaPaKaH TaPaKaH is offline
robot overlord
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,802
TaPaKaH
Send a message via ICQ to TaPaKaH Send a message via Skype™ to TaPaKaH
Default

if one core/module is bad, wouldn't running other ones at higher frequency give a better score?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-20-2012
subaruwrc subaruwrc is offline
robo cop
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: HUNGARY
Posts: 422
subaruwrc
Default

mm, GT2-GT3 is good for 1100mhz quad. 200-250 fps is exactly what i got with 5.3 sb-e at 1100mhz gpu clocks. its a shame it sucks in the other 4 tests though.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:33.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright HWBOT 2004 - 2015