|
|||||||
| Submission & member moderation Discussion on how results should be monitored, discuss doubtfull results, ... |
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|||||||
| Submission & member moderation Discussion on how results should be monitored, discuss doubtfull results, ... |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pi Fast ranking points should not be awarded
Athlon 64 3200+ Winchester Pi Fast points were awarded to M.Beier even though he chose NOT to participate in the HW Bot rankings.
Shouldn't those points be awarded instead to those members below him who did choose to participate in the rankings? See both of the web pages linked below: http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/proces...=cpubenchmarks http://www.hwbot.org/community/submi...ster_43.34_sec ================================================== ======================================= The same user, M.Beir's Super Pi 32M time was NOT to have participated in the rankings, but also received points. http://www.hwbot.org/community/submi...6min_14sec_0ms http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/proces...=cpubenchmarks The above link show the points it received that it shouldn't have. Anyway, it needs to be corrected, too. ..
__________________
Last edited by Barton; 01-17-2011 at 03:25. Reason: add yet another time that shouldn't have received points 
|
|
#3
02-12-2011, 01:47
|
|||
|
|||
|
Your links are not working.
/edit strange I can get there wihtout the www, lemme look at this...but generally this kind of thing is a bug in current bot rev mods can do nothing about.
__________________
 If you send a PM about a result, please include the link 
|
|
#4
02-12-2011, 02:09
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm thinking it's a bug, but on the other hand... the scores do actually beat the ones below them, and AFAIk he's not using a special sample - so in some way, it's fair enough that those results "steal" boints from the worse scores. However, I didn't code this - Massman must clarify if this is intended or not
 And if it can be fixed.
__________________
|
|
#5
02-12-2011, 11:46
|
||||
|
||||
|
I didn't code it either
 .Must be a bug. The 'no-point' option hasn't been updated along with the different ways to calculate points, I think. We won't fix this bug for the Rev3 as Rev4 will be completely different again (database-wise). I just removed the points manually now.
__________________
Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens. Things people say: Massman is a god (05-02-2102), You're a genius (25-10-2011), Massman, overlord of overclocking (07-30-2010), brain dead corporate dude that deserves to be stillborn (09-18-2010) Things I write: Critical thinking - Should Maximus V Extreme be banned from competitive overclocking?, HWBOT Vision 2012, The Industry’s Social Responsibilities – Support the Community., In Response to Chew's Goodbye Note (the unhealthy relation between company and community), The X58A-OC, the enthusiast community and a long-term vision, The Efficiency Rating, Hardware sharing, nostra culpa?, The paradox of a fair overclocking competition, HWBOT Memory Index v0.1, AMD Thuban Voltage and Temperature Scaling, Is LN2 on GPU really worth the trouble?
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
