|
|||||||
| HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions Suggest new or discuss existing features. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hello all,
As you might have read on the Gigabyte Tech Daily blog, there's a new software technology by LucidLogix to be launched shortly. We all know Lucid because of the crazy "let's have nvidia and ati cards work together"-technology, but this stuff is more software than it is hardware. For now. The HWBOT staff is currently discussing its policies regarding this new technology. Given the size of impact it might have on competitive benching here at HWBOT, we also like to hear what the community has to say on it. Anyway, in short, what is Lucid MVP about? Well, here's a bit of lecture for ya! Quote:
To summarize a lot of text, here's what's going on: 1) Lucid combines any IGP with a discrete graphics card 2) The IGP's task is to track down redundant frames 3) When there's a redundant frame, the IGP tells the discrete graphics card not to render it. This means that instead of rendering the entire frame (=100%), the discrete graphics card might render a part of the (~25%) or not at all (0%). 4) Because some frames are not rendered completely, more frames can be processed (20% rendering instead of 100% = 5x faster). 5) The FPS counter goes up super-dooper fast. So it boosts FPS, what's the big deal? As the PR states, the Virtu MVP is very likely to boost FPS rates by 30-70%. From tests, however, some reports state over 400% boost in FPS. A miracle? Or just cheating the counter? Neither. As Lucid indicates in interviews, the boost in FPS is not a real increase in FPS. Here are some quotes: Quote:
Quote:
Hehe, I knew you'd react in this manner (since I wrote this post). Yes, on first sight it seems to be a cheat of the FPS counter. But, well, it's not. The 'false' FPS reading is not so much the fault of the Virtu MVP, but in fact ... the fault of the FPS counter itself. Virtu MVP does not directly address the FPS counter to make the performance look better. Actually, the Virtu MVP software doesn't 'care' about the FPS when doing its tasks, it cares about render resource efficiency. As you understand fromt the process summary, this new technology makes it possible to either partially render frames or skip them entirely. The cool thing about this is that the image quality does not go down and Lucid claims the gaming responsiveness actually improves due to a better balance! Now, this technology is in fact very interesting because it resolves efficiency related issues: because the IGP figures out which frames have already been rendered, the discrete graphics card doesn't have to render it again. Instead of doing double (or triple work), the IGP makes sure it's only doing the necessary work. In my humble opinion ... it's the future .Software ... or hardware? Now, here comes another tricky part! In the whitepaper written by Lucid, they mention different implementations of this technology. One of the ideas is to have this technology embedded on-chip. Practically, put it on the IGP silicon. That would make it a hardware-based solution, not software. Just imagine this technology being implemented on a next-generation Intel IGP, with the software being adopted as one of the instruction sets. That would mean you wouldn't have to install any additional software to have the FPS boost. It would be a complete hardware-based solution. Allow or disallow? There are a lot of arguments that can be made either against the software or in favor of it. I'd like to hear your opinion on this. Please, if you want to give your opinion, also use some sort of argumentation. Posts such as "this is total shit" will not be read. Instead, you might want to post "I think this is shit, because ...". ![]()
__________________
Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens. Things people say: Massman is a god (05-02-2102), You're a genius (25-10-2011), Massman, overlord of overclocking (07-30-2010), brain dead corporate dude that deserves to be stillborn (09-18-2010) Things I write: Critical thinking - Should Maximus V Extreme be banned from competitive overclocking?, HWBOT Vision 2012, The Industry’s Social Responsibilities – Support the Community., In Response to Chew's Goodbye Note (the unhealthy relation between company and community), The X58A-OC, the enthusiast community and a long-term vision, The Efficiency Rating, Hardware sharing, nostra culpa?, The paradox of a fair overclocking competition, HWBOT Memory Index v0.1, AMD Thuban Voltage and Temperature Scaling, Is LN2 on GPU really worth the trouble? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I vote against, as a 2nd IGP or whatever aids the other card in setting new records... The choice in hardware components will be far more limited when this will be allowed...
__________________
Proud to be a warehouse OCer you don't like it ? Too bad 4 you...
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I vote against using it on existing benchmarks since this may skew the current rankings, but on some 3DMark2013 or whatever (after this technology is oficially released) why not ?
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
allow ...
companies are pushing apu in the market....why not exploit them? apu are cheap ... it would be a benefit for those who can not spend thousands of dollars for high end cpu ...I think this would make the competition for top positions affordable for more people |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Proud to be a warehouse OCer you don't like it ? Too bad 4 you...
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
...bring it on
![]() |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is good impression, but for HWBOT points I say "NO". Only without point submission category (many people hard worked at points without this category in last years and now they cant lost points because exists Lucid Virtu MVP)
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
exemple of the gain with Gigabyte GV-R7770OC-1GD stock :
![]() ![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't know what difference GPU brand makes but I can guarantee you this result was not obtained with a Gigabyte motherboard.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|