Go Back   hwbot.org > Overclocking & benchmarking > General hardware discussion

Reply
Thread Tools
  #1  
Unread 04-07-2012, 21:50
I.M.O.G.'s Avatar
I.M.O.G. I.M.O.G. is offline
transformer
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Rootstown, OH
Posts: 723
Send a message via AIM to I.M.O.G.
Default PCMark05: Revodrive 3 X2 Performance

Anyone with revodrives around here?

I have a Revodrive 3 X2 480GB (Intel NAND) currently and I'm trying to figure out why the performance is limited to 133MB/s or less for General Usage.

That is roughly the same score I got with my old Revo:
Revodrive X2 100GB 130MB/s: http://hwbot.org/submission/2231703_...20_30876_marks
Revodrive X2 100GB 116MB/s: http://hwbot.org/submission/2234747_...00_19829_marks

This review has results of Revodrive 3 X2 240GB (Micron NAND) - 132MB/s: http://www.funkykit.com/about-us/896...d.html?start=4

I see other people running Revodrives with better Gen Usage results.

Sweet 906MB/s Gen Usage (Revodrive 3 X2 480GB): http://hwbot.org/image/739126.jpg
HybridChiller 804.6MB/s Gen Usage (Revodrive X2 960GB): http://hwbot.org/submission/2190304_...50_36333_marks

Anyone else with Revodrives that can run General Usage and give further examples of Revodrive PCM05 performance? Other than a couple exceptionally good General Usage scores, I can't find any other examples of good scores on Revodrives.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by Devroush on HWBOT View Post
Of course it will be bug free, I only write flawless code.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 04-07-2012, 22:59
Christian Ney's Avatar
Christian Ney Christian Ney is offline
HWBOT STAFF
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Benchroom
Posts: 5,677
Send a message via ICQ to Christian Ney Send a message via MSN to Christian Ney Send a message via Skype™ to Christian Ney
Default

Same here, I tested a Revodrive3 x2 once and perf in general usage was also something like 133 mb/s only.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 04-07-2012, 23:24
knopflerbruce knopflerbruce is offline
Killed by Chuck Norris
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 3,904
Default

Tried to increase the pcie frrequency a little bit? Just to see if the issue is related to that.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 04-07-2012, 23:37
I.M.O.G.'s Avatar
I.M.O.G. I.M.O.G. is offline
transformer
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Rootstown, OH
Posts: 723
Send a message via AIM to I.M.O.G.
Default

Thank you for sharing christian. Helps to know I am not alone.

I have knopflerbruce. On my areca 1882ix performance scales along with pcie freq - it is a small percentage increase for each mhz. It doesn't make any difference as far as I can tell for the revodrive... certainly it doesn't make up for 600 or 700MB/s.

One thing about these revos is obvious - different models use different numbers of nand. The 240gb edition has many empty nand banks. The 480 and up have all banks populated.

Another is less obvious - the 240gb edition uses micron nand, the 480gb edition uses Intel nand.

I have ran the suite of ssd benchmarks on the revo 480gb, and my performance is what it should be - noticeable improvement across the board over the 240gb version.

This is not reflected at all in general usage performance however. Sweet hasn't been active in a few days, but I bet he may help if he knows any tricks... the revo is pretty simple tho. I don't know how much there really is to tweak.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by Devroush on HWBOT View Post
Of course it will be bug free, I only write flawless code.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 04-08-2012, 00:48
S_A_V's Avatar
S_A_V S_A_V is offline
V.I.P.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: St.-Petersburg, Russia
Posts: 274
Send a message via ICQ to S_A_V
Default

Tried old RevoDrive x2 100Gb one year ago, got only 170-175 Mb/s in General Usage and 347 Mb/s Virus Scan.
Used first (highest) PCI-E x16 slot on motherboard for RevoDrive.
May be it is related to caching.
Discrete RAID-controllers use onboard RAM for cache.
Integrated (onboard) RAID-controllers use software cache (Intel RST / AMD RAID BIOS).
Revodrive don't use any cache, except some small memory inside SandForce controller.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 04-08-2012, 00:57
I.M.O.G.'s Avatar
I.M.O.G. I.M.O.G. is offline
transformer
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Rootstown, OH
Posts: 723
Send a message via AIM to I.M.O.G.
Default

Thanks s_a_v, appreciate your experience also.

I agree, I feel like it has to have something to do with caching. The really big Gen usage scores are mostly done by mikecdm, stevero, and myself (we all have multiple big Gen usage submissions) - all with discrete raid with onboard ram caching. For whatever reason, onboard Raid boosts virus scan, but it does not do that well on Gen usage.

There are a couple exceptions however, and all of those I am aware of are done with revodrives.

I am going to keep trying different things, will report back anything I can figure out.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by Devroush on HWBOT View Post
Of course it will be bug free, I only write flawless code.

Last edited by I.M.O.G.; 04-08-2012 at 01:01.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 04-08-2012, 01:59
Stelaras Stelaras is offline
robo cop
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 322
Default

I have for testing one revodrive 3 x2 also . The 480GB version.

General usage maxes around 150MB ... and virus scan at 200Mb .

I'd love to hear from Sweet how he manages to get 900mb general ...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 04-08-2012, 02:03
I.M.O.G.'s Avatar
I.M.O.G. I.M.O.G. is offline
transformer
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Rootstown, OH
Posts: 723
Send a message via AIM to I.M.O.G.
Default

Virus scan can vary a lot I think. I was getting 275 or so.

I didn't pay much attention because it can't compete in virus scan. In general usage it shows potential... though its beginning to look very rare/exceptional.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by Devroush on HWBOT View Post
Of course it will be bug free, I only write flawless code.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 04-12-2012, 18:05
amdnord amdnord is offline
maintenance bot
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: GREECE
Posts: 43
Default

bump!

just curious about the revodrive3 x2.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 04-12-2012, 20:08
I.M.O.G.'s Avatar
I.M.O.G. I.M.O.G. is offline
transformer
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Rootstown, OH
Posts: 723
Send a message via AIM to I.M.O.G.
Default

I will update with more results and testing, probably tonight.

I'll be trying to replicate the super high gen usage scores, or at least higher than 500MB/s in general usage.

It sounds like everyone who has tried has never gotten higher than 200MB/s gen usage on the Revo, except a couple great submissions.

I have some ideas to try however. Anyone have a tip on the best way to quickly "refresh" these drives? On the vertex3 maxiops I would use the bootable tools from OCZ to do a secure erase... Its a pain to do that however as it takes time. Any quicker way to do a secure erase on these and get back to original performance levels?
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by Devroush on HWBOT View Post
Of course it will be bug free, I only write flawless code.

Last edited by I.M.O.G.; 04-12-2012 at 20:10.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:51.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright COLARDYN IT GCV 2004 - 2013