|
|||||||
| HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions Suggest new or discuss existing features. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi,
Im just trying to browse the results in e2140 category here> http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/proces..._e2140_1.6ghz/ but many are wrong. For instance PCM 04 record shows a Pentium 3 UC Bench score, PCM Vantage record shows a 3DM 03 result, Spi 32m record shows a Pentium 4 D 960 Wprime result and PCM 07 record is showing as a Phenom II x4 960 PCM Vantage result. There are too many for it to be a case of ppl accidentally submitting to wrong category. Also I sometimes get this error when I try clicking any of the Rankings links> ![]() |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
This isn't okay...
![]() |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Seems fine here?
![]()
__________________
Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens. Things people say: Massman is a god (05-02-2102), You're a genius (25-10-2011), Massman, overlord of overclocking (07-30-2010), brain dead corporate dude that deserves to be stillborn (09-18-2010) Things I write: Critical thinking - Should Maximus V Extreme be banned from competitive overclocking?, HWBOT Vision 2012, The Industry’s Social Responsibilities – Support the Community., In Response to Chew's Goodbye Note (the unhealthy relation between company and community), The X58A-OC, the enthusiast community and a long-term vision, The Efficiency Rating, Hardware sharing, nostra culpa?, The paradox of a fair overclocking competition, HWBOT Memory Index v0.1, AMD Thuban Voltage and Temperature Scaling, Is LN2 on GPU really worth the trouble? |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
e2140 results showing correct for me now and no more errors
![]() I guess a caching problem is right, Thanx ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|