|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
is quadro2pro ok, for the geforce 2
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
If Quadro4 isn't allowed for Geforce4, do you really think Quadro2 would be allowed for Geforce2?
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Any word on prizes???
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
So I'm benching my AGP cards, and cpuz reads this: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2408148 despite the fact that the fsb is 266.
Is this going to be a problem? or should I spend time figuring it out
Last edited by just_nuke_em; 06-17-2012 at 01:24. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
385.19 mhz fsb?
![]() my doesn´t work @ 283 mhz (air cooling) -.- i´ve heard a lot about bad cpu- and gpu-samples but in this case i´ve a bad motherboard-sample ![]() nice result
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
CPUz is reporting it wrong, but it is validating it. FSB is 266. Or am I the only one that sees a QX9650 @ 5ghz with 1.2v incredible unrealistic
, and on a 4coredual-sata2 of all boards.I guess no one seems to care, so I will keep doing what I'm doing. Last edited by just_nuke_em; 06-20-2012 at 18:42. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
It likely has to do with the fact that the QX9650 isn't officially recognized by the board. It will work but the handicapped FSB probably messes up the CPUz validation.
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
My GeForce 9800GT RLZ!!xD
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|